Category Archives: innovation

B4RN – Broadband For The Rural North

Heading to Lancaster and the launch of “B4RN”  an innovative project in bringing FTTH to the people, by the people.  This from their site

The purpose of the project is to take a new approach to the ownership, financial and deployment models used traditionally, and still proposed by, telecommunications companies. These models invariably leave rural areas outside of the scope of economic viability for the telecoms companies, and have helped to create the Digital Divide between rural and urban Britain.

The event was packed – standing room only and a lively audience with lots and lots of questions.  It seemed surprising to some local people there that there were so many “foreigners” there.  As a Yorkshireman, based in Kent, I am foreign in so many ways!  One distinguished-looking lady kept asking “Why are they here? What are they doing here?”  and someone else said (and you can see it on video) “The eyes of the world are on you!”.

It was a great event – the various politicos; Mayors etc seemed impressed and quite surprised at the strong turn-out.  A notable (and worrying) absence of Lancaster Council officers and County Council people; and no one from BDUK (though I’m sure they would have been welcome!).  You may speculate why they were not there…

Here’s a video of the Mayor cutting the cake!

I made an Audioboo in the event space immediately after the formal presentations finished, trying to capture some of the excitement in the room.  You can hear it in the  embed below.

I also spent a bit of time with Barry Forde – and was keen to get his take on what ‘demand ‘ means.  I also wanted to understand the dynamics of this project.

And there was massive interest afterwards in looking at the network plan…..

Here’s a liveblog, which went live at 0912 on 15th December, catching tweets with the #b4rn hashtag. I tried my best to use it for the launch but poor connectivity defeated me.

INCA Seminar – Models for Next Generation Broadband

In collaboration with NYnet and Manchester Digital Development Agency
Sponsored by Fujitsu Telecom and the Nominet Trust

24th November 2011 Royal York Hotel, Station Parade, York, YO24 1AA

National Freelancers Day

The Freelance Lecture 2011

I covered this event for PCG and Amplified Networks (both Not For Profit organisations).  PCG is effectively a ‘trade association’ which speaks out for Freelancers.  This is the third year they have sponsored National Freelancers Day – and it seems to be getting bigger every year.  It was great fun and I learnt a lot. (Photo courtesy Benjamin Ellis)

I talked to a couple of the speakers after the event and made some audioboo.

Karen Stephenson was insightful and the way she spoke about how freelancers in organisations can ‘connect’ and innovate gave me a lot to think about.  She focused on the importance for freelancers of building ‘trust networks’ both inside client businesses and with other freelancers.

I also interviewed John Brazier – he’s the Managing Director of PCG and I spoke to him about how he sees the role of freelancers developing, and in particular, the descriptor; should it be “Freelance” or “Independent Professional”?

I like the term Freelance…

Working with Steve Lawson and Benjamin Ellis is always fun.  Benjamin ran round taking photos, Steve concentrated on generating conversations on Twittter about the event and I liveblogged using CoveritLive – incorporating Tweets from a number of hashtags.  It’s high pressure stuff – but a great buzz.  There was a lot of action on the #nfd23nov hashtag.  Here’s a report from Tweetreach:

Here’s the liveblog:

“Social Networks for Business Advantage”

I spoke at the Communications Managers’ Association conference “Communications –  the Key UK Growth Accelerator” on March 9th; I had a 10 minute plenary slot.  The CMA is a trade association whose members are responsible for about £15bn of spending on IT/Comms. I’ve written up the notes I used for the talk and they follow.

I said I was ‘the light relief before coffee’  – talking about ‘Social Networking for Business Advantage’.  Two global brands and an ex Ofcom senior person spoke before I did.

I started by saying – of course, this audience will probably regard Social Networking  as “all that fluffy stuff your marketing and PR people may be waffling on about” – the audience’s body language said as much!  “Oh and a few geeks might be going on about it as well.”  You can just make them all go away; but it’s coming to something when the marketing and PR people  and your geeks are on the same side!  Might be worth thinking about a bit.

The question is, can we gain Business Advantage from Social Networking?  My approach was to talk about three things which make it important for me, and which might be useful in thinking further; it’s about

  • Being entrepreneurial; and taking a bit of risk in a new area
  • Avoiding being caught in the hype – but don’t let your predjudices (people Tweeting about what they had for breakfast for example) drive your behaviours
  • Being prepared to have a go at it  – for yourself; to see how it might work (or not!)

Being Entrepreneurial

I was described as “Entrepreneur” in the programme and I joked that the conference organisers had looked at my bio and thought “No idea what he does – just put Entrepreneur – he won’t mind”. You’ll also note that that they didn’t put “wildly successful and influential” in front of “Entrepreneur”.  Nor did they put “failed”.  I’m working on the former – and have had a bit of the latter (but not too much).

I set up on my own in late 2002 – and I now do lots of things.  Consulting with Complexity Partners where I work with Thias Martin and Neil Gregory and a network of other business partners.   I’m on the Board of CBN (a Coop) and Aquafuel Research Limited (a venture capital backed technology business).  I work closely with Amplified Networks (a not for profit) at the cutting edge of the use of social media and collaborative working.

I use Social Networks to sustain meaningful conversations with customers, stakeholders and business partners.  I’m actively using technology to generate realtime and near-realtime content using widely available technology; mostly for C4CC and Amplified.

Over the past 6 years or so, Social Networks have become an integral part of the way I do business.

One of Complexity Partners’ major projects is the Centre for Creative Collaboration (“C4CC”).  C4CC is a joint venture between the University of London, Goldsmiths, Central School of Speech and Drama and Complexity.  C4CC exists to support collaborations that can deliver both economic impact and public value.

The hypothesis is that by focusing the development of Creative Industry businesses – most of them SMEs (as one of the key outcomes of the work at C4CC), we can make rapid and meaningful economic impacts.  These businesses can grow faster (and fail faster!) and offer the potential for employment growth over and above that of “traditional” STEM based businesses.

As part of this, the management of the Social and other networks around C4CC is an integral part of the design.  We actively manage the Physical, Virtual and Social ‘spaces’.  We have a Social Artist in Residence.  We host London’s Leading Social Media Cafe (aka the “Tuttle Club”) and a number of other business, cultural and artistic and performance networks.  And we do this for reasons of ‘Business Advantage’.

The power of the approach I describe is that it brings the kind of people we want to work with into the space.  And we invite them in on their terms – not ours.  And it’s working.

Avoiding the hype

I warned earlier about not being caught in the hype; a collection of anecdotes (sometimes called ‘”case studies”) does not deliver actionable data.  However in using Social Networks we can both set sensible metrics and track them.  So, in the case of C4CC what are the data for our first 12 months of operation?:

  • Collaborative projects; target set 20; actually achieved 80
  • People involved in projects and events; target set 200; actually achieved 2,100

And we were told “There’s no demand” for this kind of neutral collaboration space combined with high quality support and facilitation services.   We also have 4 start-up businesses (2 emerging from projects at C4CC and 2 we have brought in from outside).

Being prepared to have a go

Over the past 12 months or so, interest in Social Networks from businesses has grown and seems to have accelerated over the past 6 months.  Much of the action has so far been in the B2C area with ‘Big Brands’ using Social Networks to promote themselves and communicate.

And there is massive potential in B2B and also in internal communications; Enterprise versions of Social Media tools for example.  But to capture the value in this, it’s necessary to ‘have a go’ and not leave it to the PRs and the geeks.

Recently I was at a Round Table discussion of the use of Social Networks by business; a scattering of Fortune 500 companies, technology companies; a mixture of operational people, public affairs people and consultants.  All discussing the impact of Social Networks on business; and one of the participants,  a very senior corporate public  affairs person said “The Genie is out of the bottle – it’s just that the “C-Suite” hasn’t accepted it yet”.

So the best thing to do – is have a go.  And remember, this is what we wanted – pervasive, ubiquitous, accessible IT/Comms technology.  Deeply embedded in our lives  and businesses.  So we have to deal with it by getting involved.

Making the case for higher education in the creative economy

A particularly apposite time to hold this event.  Here’s an event overview from Universities UK

“In light of the comprehensive spending review, and following the changes to the regional development funding structures, we will need to assess what this will this mean for collaboration between higher education and the creative industries.

This conference will launch a report on the role of UK universities in supporting the creative industries, particularly during the current economic downturn. The report will make a number of key recommendations to Government regarding their future thinking around supporting the creative industries through higher education partnerships.”

You can find more information on speakers and programme here

Immediately after the event, I made an audioboo piece – which gives you a flavour of the feeling in the room and some thoughts on “Frustration and Fear”:

Here’s a Liveblog of the Plenary sessions:

Should the University Survive in its current form?

What does the future hold for universities? What could the role of the university be in the Big Society? As part of the Inside/Out Festival the University of London hosts a debate on the issue.

Speakers:
May Chien Busch, MCB Enterprises, ex Chief Operating Officer Morgan Stanley Europe
Professor Geoffrey Crossick, Vice-Chancellor, University of London
Professor AC Grayling, Birkbeck, University of London
Professor Rick Rylance, Chief Executive, Arts and Humanities Research Council
Rt Hon David Willetts MP, Minister of State for the Universities and Science

Chair:
Anne McElvoy, New Statesman Columnist and Executive Editor of the London Evening Standard.

I’m liveblogging the event using a web-based service called CoveritLive

[Please note that the liveblog is my notes taken in realtime at the event and not a transcript – happy to take any comments or corrections].

Designing the city: What role for design in London’s future

In this STIR Lecture (Simulator Teaching Innovation Research) at Imperial College, the role of design in London’s future was to be ‘debated’; except there was no debate. Mighty good stuff though.

Sir George Cox plugging away; telling anecdotes (mostly about the previous administration) and giving really good examples of how design skills and process can contribute value to product and service design.

Matt Hunter, head of the Design Council – using the ‘hokey cokey’ approach to rhetoric (you put London in, you take London out . . . .) and speaking passionately about the need to ’embed design in policy-making’ (bless)

Dan Phillips Group Director of Sustainability of Buro Happold got off to a bit of a slow start but got into his stride, talking about the need for a big change in attitude from both the designers and providers of goods and services; “There’s a sense that the utilities want to sell us power and gas – but they ought to be selling ‘warmth’ and ‘light’.”

More about the speakers here:
http://www.designlondon.net/stir-lectures/past-stir-lectures/#20-speakers

And why was there no debate?  Because all the speakers agreed with each other (and themselves) that Design was central to the changes we need to make in our economy and society – but is anyone listening?

Transformational Digital Infrastructure (“TDI”)

Last week, Shaun Fensom and I went to Birmingham for CBN to talk to Digital Birmingham about NGA strategy and developments in the wider City Region. We realised during a sequence of discussions with regeneration specialists and others that there’s been ‘language capture’ going on. The telecoms industry, in it’s usual way, has used the ‘naming of things’ to confuse the picture. So ‘First Generation Broadband’ aka ADSL was never really ‘broad’, and Next Generation Access is undefined, largely. But we’ve got ‘Superfast Broadband’ now; well, some of us have.  So that’s all right then.

There’s an overfocus on speed. And a lack of visibility of connection quality, the need for symmetry, levels of contention, latency and jitter. In the past, in Regeneration and Planning ‘connectivity’ meant roads, airports and rail. The good news is that there is increasing realisation on a regional and City-regional basis that Digital Connectivity is increasingly important and needs to be planned in; and not left to the industry to not-deliver it.

So we need a new term. and Shaun and I agreed we would blog about it. So here it is. We need “Transformational Digital Infrastructure” – it’s not just about the technology. And it’s not some false polarisation of the “Pipes and/or Poetry” mafia.

It’s a much richer picture of the human and technical networks needed to bring about Digital Britain.

Tweeting the politics – party conferences 2009

This year Twitter made its impact felt on the Party Conference circuit.  I went to NESTA Fringe meetings in Brighton last week and in Manchester this week.  I came up with the idea of seeing whether the Tweetstreams might tell us something about the relative states of those two parties.  The results are, I think, intriguing.

#cpc09 beats #lab09 hands down

totvolI’ve looked at the main hashtags being used at both the Labour and Conservative Party conferences over a comparable period in each case (beginning on Sunday and ending on Thursday).  The total volume of Tweets with the #lab09 tag was 10,379 compared with 12,733 with the cpc09 tag.  The numbers are derived from time series data kindly provided by What The Hashtag?! and I acknowledge the help of Mark Bockenstedt for his advice in understanding how to use the API.

Naturally, all I’m doing is looking at Tweets tagged with those particular hastags – I don’t know at this stage what the contents or stance of the Tweets might be; whether positive or negative.

Time series data . . . hmmmm

We can also examine the flow of Tweets over time (and looking at the structure of flow is always instructive).

lab09This picture shows the daily volume of Tweets with the #lab09 tag, beginning on the Sunday (Day 1) and running until Thursday (Day 5).  When I saw this picture, I wasn’t particularly surprised – it shows a build-up of activity each day with a ‘peak’ on Tuesday; the day when Gordon Brown did his ‘big speech’ to conference.  Looks like activity diminished somewhat on Wednesday and Thursday – and indeed, recalling the news coverage at the time there was talk of the conference ‘going a bit flat’.

cpc09Looking at the daily volume of Tweets tagged #cpc09 is a bit more surprising.  Day 2 (Monday)  was the day Boris Johnson ‘did his thing’ and William Hague gave a keynote.  Day 3 was George Osbourne’s Gloomy Day.  Day 5 (yesterday) was David Cameron’s ‘big speech’.

Now examine the two charts together

Look at the volumes; only once did the #lab09 tag reach over 3,000 per day; and that was when Gordon Brown spoke.  And the daily volumes were consistently larger for #cpc09.  Activity levels higher across the piece.  And it seems to me, by observation, there seems to be more ‘momentum’ in the #cpc09 hashtag.  Certainly, I noted (and Audioboo’d about) the generally less cheerful and relatively more cheerful feels of the Labour conference people I observed versus the Conservative conference people.  Note I was just in each city (actually on the Tuesday) and at Fringe events outside the ‘security zone’.

It’s just an observation – and you may have some thoughts

What does it mean?  I should add that I’ve looked at hashtag activity extending both sides of the Labour conference and for the run up to the Conservative one.  There are no glaringly obvious patterns and, in any event I have produced comparable stats on the same chart scales for each conference.

I’m still thinking about what, if anything, this analysis tells us.  It could be that the volume of #cpc09 tweets reflects relatively more negative traffic (ie Labour supporters using the hashtag to criticise the Tory conference) than is in the #lab09 Tweetstream.  It could just be that the disquiet of the Labour supporters is reflected in their lower use of the #lab09 hashtag – staying quiet rather than Tweeting negative thoughts.  Please feel free to comment if you have further thoughts.

Why no #ldc09?

Well, I can’t get back in time as far as the Liberal Democrat conference – Twittersearch says “No older Tweets available” and they’re not there on WTHashtag?! either.  Which brings me to a further thought – Tweets are ephemera.  they vanish into the ether after about 10 days or so as I understand it. However their nature Which, will, I think, become an issue if Twitter starts to have an impact on the political process . . .

Because it should have been #ldconf

Thanks to Tory Bear for pointing out my error, and also, see his comment below.  My reading (such as it is) of the Tweetstream from #cpc09 does tally with his view.

3parties

So here we have the Tweets from the Liberal Democrat conference alongside the Labour and Tory ones (it’s not quite midnight oil burning yet . . ).

The choice of hashtag is a bit odd, I think – not including the year does not follow ‘best emerging practice’ such as it is.  I wonder, to what extent, the choice of this hashtag was really planned?

ldconf1Now for the timeseries data, shown on the same scale as #lab09 and cpc09 above.  At this scale, the detail is not apparent – and when I look at the numbers, the daily volumes vary from about 700 Tweets per day (Shall I define a new unit – Tpd?) to 900 Tpd.  So the idea tha the Lib Dems are somehow more sociable and chatty does not seem to be borne out by the evidence.

Endnote: You can find my other material on the conference fringe events on the Amplified09 website:

Amplifying Nesta at the Labour Party Conference

Amplifying NESTA at the Conservative Party Conference – Getting Creative

Creative industries and recovery – the Red Banners look dull

Immediately after the Nesta event, I made an Audioboo. Here it is. It’s an account of a well-chaired, well paced meeting. But ‘more of the same’ really from the panel. A bit of a worry when the Government sees the creative industries as a way out of the current economic difficulties and as a source of new growth.

Listen!